Azerbaijan vs North Macedonia: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Azerbaijan
0.243
in 2023
North Macedonia
0.243
in 2023
Azerbaijan rank
112th
North Macedonia rank
112th

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • North Macedonia
00.10.20.30.40.5201520192023

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 0.243 against 0.243 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Azerbaijan ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 112th and North Macedonia ranks 112th of 177 countries.

Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2010s 0.2528 0.1036 0.1492 Azerbaijan
2020s 0.243 0.208 0.035 Azerbaijan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Azerbaijan or North Macedonia?
Azerbaijan, at 0.243 against 0.243 in North Macedonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Azerbaijan and North Macedonia?
0, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and North Macedonia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Azerbaijan and North Macedonia rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Azerbaijan ranks 112th and North Macedonia ranks 112th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.