Armenia vs Cape Verde: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Armenia
0.283
in 2023
Cape Verde
0.283
in 2023
Armenia rank
87th
Cape Verde rank
87th

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Armenia
  • Cape Verde
0.10.20.30.4201520192023

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 0.283 against 0.283 in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Armenia ranks 87th and Cape Verde ranks 87th of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Cape Verde in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Cape Verde Difference Ahead
2010s 0.1462 0.1338 0.0124 Armenia
2020s 0.226 0.33 0.104 Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Armenia or Cape Verde?
Armenia, at 0.283 against 0.283 in Cape Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Armenia and Cape Verde?
0, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Cape Verde?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Armenia and Cape Verde rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Armenia ranks 87th and Cape Verde ranks 87th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.