Afghanistan vs Nicaragua: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Afghanistan
0.199
in 2023
Nicaragua
0.199
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
127th
Nicaragua rank
127th

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Nicaragua
0.050.10.150.20.250.3201520192023

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 0.199 against 0.199 in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Afghanistan ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 127th and Nicaragua ranks 127th of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Nicaragua Difference Ahead
2010s 0.2038 0.1384 0.0654 Afghanistan
2020s 0.1735 0.184 0.0105 Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Afghanistan or Nicaragua?
Afghanistan, at 0.199 against 0.199 in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Afghanistan and Nicaragua?
0, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Nicaragua?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Nicaragua rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Afghanistan ranks 127th and Nicaragua ranks 127th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.