Afghanistan vs Liberia: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data

Afghanistan
0.199
in 2023
Liberia
0.208
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
127th
Liberia rank
126th

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Liberia
0.050.10.150.20.250.3201520192023

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 0.208 against 0.199 in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.009.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Afghanistan ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 127th and Liberia ranks 126th of 177 countries.

Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Liberia Difference Ahead
2010s 0.2038 0.1912 0.0126 Afghanistan
2020s 0.1735 0.1735 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.3: geospatial data, Afghanistan or Liberia?
Liberia, at 0.208 against 0.199 in Afghanistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.3: geospatial data between Afghanistan and Liberia?
0.009, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Liberia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Liberia rank globally for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Afghanistan ranks 127th and Liberia ranks 126th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.