Russia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data
Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data over time
- Russia
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Russia currently reports 1 against 1 in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
Russia ranks 1st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 1st of 214 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russia | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | Russia |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 4.2: administrative data, Russia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Russia, at 1 against 1 in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 4.2: administrative data between Russia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 0, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Russia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for dimension 4.2: administrative data?
- Russia ranks 1st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 1st of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average score for CRVS indicator. An ideal indicator would include a score based on the density of administrative data available in sectors of social protection, education, labor, and health. However, social protection, education, health, and labor admin data indicators not included because of lack of established methodology. While our team identified several promising sources for administrative data from the World Bank's ASPIRE team, WHO, UNESCO, and ILO, incomplete coverage across countries made us drop these indicators from our index. A major research and data collection effort is needed from all custodian agencies to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of administrative data availability can be produced.