Namibia vs South Sudan: Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data
Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data over time
- Namibia
- South Sudan
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 against 0 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was South Sudan ahead.
Namibia ranks 144th and South Sudan ranks 144th of 214 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0.05 | 0 | 0.05 | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 4.2: administrative data, Namibia or South Sudan?
- Namibia, at 0 against 0 in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 4.2: administrative data between Namibia and South Sudan?
- 0, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and South Sudan?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Namibia and South Sudan rank globally for dimension 4.2: administrative data?
- Namibia ranks 144th and South Sudan ranks 144th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average score for CRVS indicator. An ideal indicator would include a score based on the density of administrative data available in sectors of social protection, education, labor, and health. However, social protection, education, health, and labor admin data indicators not included because of lack of established methodology. While our team identified several promising sources for administrative data from the World Bank's ASPIRE team, WHO, UNESCO, and ILO, incomplete coverage across countries made us drop these indicators from our index. A major research and data collection effort is needed from all custodian agencies to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of administrative data availability can be produced.