Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
1
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
1
in 2023
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank
1st
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
1st

Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data over time

  • Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.20.40.60.81200420132023

How they compare

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China currently reports 1 against 1 in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 1st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 1st of 217 countries.

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 0 0 0
2010s 0.5 0.4 0.1 Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 4.2: administrative data, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China, at 1 against 1 in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 4.2: administrative data between Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0, with Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Turks and Caicos Islands?
20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for dimension 4.2: administrative data?
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 1st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 1st of 217 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/dimension-4-2-administrative-data/hong-kong-sar-china/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/dimension-4-2-administrative-data/hong-kong-sar-china/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 4,340 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Average score for CRVS indicator. An ideal indicator would include a score based on the density of administrative data available in sectors of social protection, education, labor, and health. However, social protection, education, health, and labor admin data indicators not included because of lack of established methodology. While our team identified several promising sources for administrative data from the World Bank's ASPIRE team, WHO, UNESCO, and ILO, incomplete coverage across countries made us drop these indicators from our index. A major research and data collection effort is needed from all custodian agencies to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of administrative data availability can be produced.