Hong Kong (China) vs Saint Martin: Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data
Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data over time
- Hong Kong (China)
- Saint Martin
How they compare
Hong Kong (China) currently reports 1 against 1 in Saint Martin, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Saint Martin ahead.
Hong Kong (China) ranks 1st and Saint Martin ranks 1st of 217 countries.
Hong Kong (China) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong (China) | Saint Martin | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 2010s | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | Hong Kong (China) |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 4.2: administrative data, Hong Kong (China) or Saint Martin?
- Hong Kong (China), at 1 against 1 in Saint Martin as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 4.2: administrative data between Hong Kong (China) and Saint Martin?
- 0, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Saint Martin?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong (China) and Saint Martin rank globally for dimension 4.2: administrative data?
- Hong Kong (China) ranks 1st and Saint Martin ranks 1st of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average score for CRVS indicator. An ideal indicator would include a score based on the density of administrative data available in sectors of social protection, education, labor, and health. However, social protection, education, health, and labor admin data indicators not included because of lack of established methodology. While our team identified several promising sources for administrative data from the World Bank's ASPIRE team, WHO, UNESCO, and ILO, incomplete coverage across countries made us drop these indicators from our index. A major research and data collection effort is needed from all custodian agencies to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of administrative data availability can be produced.