El Salvador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data
Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data over time
- El Salvador
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 1 against 1 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
El Salvador ranks 1st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 1st of 217 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 2010s | 0.5 | 0.45 | 0.05 | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 4.2: administrative data, El Salvador or Sao Tome and Principe?
- El Salvador, at 1 against 1 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 4.2: administrative data between El Salvador and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for dimension 4.2: administrative data?
- El Salvador ranks 1st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 1st of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average score for CRVS indicator. An ideal indicator would include a score based on the density of administrative data available in sectors of social protection, education, labor, and health. However, social protection, education, health, and labor admin data indicators not included because of lack of established methodology. While our team identified several promising sources for administrative data from the World Bank's ASPIRE team, WHO, UNESCO, and ILO, incomplete coverage across countries made us drop these indicators from our index. A major research and data collection effort is needed from all custodian agencies to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of administrative data availability can be produced.