Channel Islands vs Latvia: Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data
Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data over time
- Channel Islands
- Latvia
How they compare
Channel Islands currently reports 1 against 1 in Latvia, a difference of 0.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Channel Islands ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 2 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Channel Islands | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.1 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 4.2: administrative data, Channel Islands or Latvia?
- Channel Islands, at 1 against 1 in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 4.2: administrative data between Channel Islands and Latvia?
- 0, with Channel Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Channel Islands and Latvia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Channel Islands and Latvia rank globally for dimension 4.2: administrative data?
- Channel Islands ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 2 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average score for CRVS indicator. An ideal indicator would include a score based on the density of administrative data available in sectors of social protection, education, labor, and health. However, social protection, education, health, and labor admin data indicators not included because of lack of established methodology. While our team identified several promising sources for administrative data from the World Bank's ASPIRE team, WHO, UNESCO, and ILO, incomplete coverage across countries made us drop these indicators from our index. A major research and data collection effort is needed from all custodian agencies to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of administrative data availability can be produced.