Bahrain vs United Arab Emirates: Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data
Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data over time
- Bahrain
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Bahrain currently reports 1 against 1 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
Across all 20 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.
Bahrain ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 1st of 214 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 4.2: administrative data, Bahrain or United Arab Emirates?
- Bahrain, at 1 against 1 in United Arab Emirates as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 4.2: administrative data between Bahrain and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with Bahrain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and United Arab Emirates?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Bahrain and United Arab Emirates rank globally for dimension 4.2: administrative data?
- Bahrain ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 1st of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average score for CRVS indicator. An ideal indicator would include a score based on the density of administrative data available in sectors of social protection, education, labor, and health. However, social protection, education, health, and labor admin data indicators not included because of lack of established methodology. While our team identified several promising sources for administrative data from the World Bank's ASPIRE team, WHO, UNESCO, and ILO, incomplete coverage across countries made us drop these indicators from our index. A major research and data collection effort is needed from all custodian agencies to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of administrative data availability can be produced.