American Samoa vs New Zealand: Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data
Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data over time
- American Samoa
- New Zealand
How they compare
American Samoa currently reports 1 against 1 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
Across all 20 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
American Samoa ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 214 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | American Samoa | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 4.2: administrative data, American Samoa or New Zealand?
- American Samoa, at 1 against 1 in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 4.2: administrative data between American Samoa and New Zealand?
- 0, with American Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and New Zealand?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do American Samoa and New Zealand rank globally for dimension 4.2: administrative data?
- American Samoa ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 4.2: Administrative Data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average score for CRVS indicator. An ideal indicator would include a score based on the density of administrative data available in sectors of social protection, education, labor, and health. However, social protection, education, health, and labor admin data indicators not included because of lack of established methodology. While our team identified several promising sources for administrative data from the World Bank's ASPIRE team, WHO, UNESCO, and ILO, incomplete coverage across countries made us drop these indicators from our index. A major research and data collection effort is needed from all custodian agencies to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of administrative data availability can be produced.