Libya vs East Timor: Dimension 3.2: Economic Statistics

Libya
0.6737
in 2023
East Timor
0.6888
in 2023
Libya rank
176th
East Timor rank
173rd

Dimension 3.2: Economic Statistics over time

  • Libya
  • East Timor
0.20.30.40.50.60.7200420132023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 0.6888 against 0.6737 in Libya, a difference of 0.0151.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was East Timor ahead.

Libya ranks 176th and East Timor ranks 173rd of 214 countries.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 0.3206 0.4082 0.0876 East Timor
2010s 0.328 0.4614 0.1335 East Timor
2020s 0.6031 0.6429 0.0398 East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 3.2: economic statistics, Libya or East Timor?
East Timor, at 0.6888 against 0.6737 in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 3.2: economic statistics between Libya and East Timor?
0.0151, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and East Timor?
20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
How do Libya and East Timor rank globally for dimension 3.2: economic statistics?
Libya ranks 176th and East Timor ranks 173rd of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 3.2: Economic Statistics. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 3.2: Economic Statistics
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
215 places, 4,300 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Average score for Goal 7-12 indicators. See 3.1.