Liechtenstein vs Macao: Dimension 3.1: Social Statistics
Dimension 3.1: Social Statistics over time
- Liechtenstein
- Macao
How they compare
Liechtenstein currently reports 0.2557 against 0.1983 in Macao, a difference of 0.0574.
That makes Liechtenstein's figure about 1.3 times Macao's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Liechtenstein ahead.
Liechtenstein ranks 195th and Macao ranks 196th of 214 countries.
Liechtenstein has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liechtenstein | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1979 | 0.1613 | 0.0366 | Liechtenstein |
| 2010s | 0.1805 | 0.1609 | 0.0196 | Liechtenstein |
| 2020s | 0.2572 | 0.2127 | 0.0446 | Liechtenstein |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 3.1: social statistics, Liechtenstein or Macao?
- Liechtenstein, at 0.2557 against 0.1983 in Macao as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 3.1: social statistics between Liechtenstein and Macao?
- 0.0574, with Liechtenstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liechtenstein and Macao?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Liechtenstein and Macao rank globally for dimension 3.1: social statistics?
- Liechtenstein ranks 195th and Macao ranks 196th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 3.1: Social Statistics. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average score for Goal 1-6 indicators. The primary data source is the UN SDG database. Whilst this is a database with comprehensive coverage that all countries have signed up to, it is clear that many (particularly developed countries) are not yet submitting their available national data. Scores for these countries are likely to represent an indicator of their willingness to submit national data rather than their performance in calculating the indicators. For OECD countries, we supplement the UN SDG database with comparable data submitted to the OECD following the methodology in Measuring Distance to the SDG Targets 2019: An Assessment of Where OECD Countries Stand (https://www.oecd.org/sdd/measuring-distance-to-the-sdg-targets-2019-a8caf3fa-en.htm).