South Korea vs Luxembourg: Dimension 2.2: Online access

South Korea
0.802
in 2023
Luxembourg
0.807
in 2023
South Korea rank
24th
Luxembourg rank
22nd

Dimension 2.2: Online access over time

  • South Korea
  • Luxembourg
00.20.40.60.8201620192023

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 0.807 against 0.802 in South Korea, a difference of 0.005.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was South Korea ahead.

South Korea ranks 24th and Luxembourg ranks 22nd of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2010s 0.7463 0.6227 0.1235 South Korea
2020s 0.7935 0.808 0.0145 Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access, South Korea or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 0.807 against 0.802 in South Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access between South Korea and Luxembourg?
0.005, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Luxembourg?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do South Korea and Luxembourg rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access?
South Korea ranks 24th and Luxembourg ranks 22nd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 2.2: Online access. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

ODIN Open Data Openness score. This is a well-established data source with good country coverage. In using this indicator, it is important to describe carefully what is captured since the purpose of ODIN is different to the purpose of the SPI.