Guinea-Bissau vs Sudan: Dimension 2.2: Online access

Guinea-Bissau
0.21
in 2023
Sudan
0.238
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
171st
Sudan rank
169th

Dimension 2.2: Online access over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Sudan
0.10.20.30.4201520192023

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 0.238 against 0.21 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.028.

That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Sudan ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 171st and Sudan ranks 169th of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 0.2992 0.2896 0.0096 Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.21 0.238 0.028 Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access, Guinea-Bissau or Sudan?
Sudan, at 0.238 against 0.21 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access between Guinea-Bissau and Sudan?
0.028, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Sudan?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Sudan rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 171st and Sudan ranks 169th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 2.2: Online access. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

ODIN Open Data Openness score. This is a well-established data source with good country coverage. In using this indicator, it is important to describe carefully what is captured since the purpose of ODIN is different to the purpose of the SPI.