Eswatini vs Turkmenistan: Dimension 2.2: Online access

Eswatini
0.17
in 2023
Turkmenistan
0.014
in 2023
Eswatini rank
174th
Turkmenistan rank
177th

Dimension 2.2: Online access over time

  • Eswatini
  • Turkmenistan
00.050.10.150.2201520192023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.17 against 0.014 in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.156.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 12.1 times Turkmenistan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 174th and Turkmenistan ranks 177th of 177 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
2010s 0.1116 0.0858 0.0258 Eswatini
2020s 0.144 0.014 0.13 Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access, Eswatini or Turkmenistan?
Eswatini, at 0.17 against 0.014 in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access between Eswatini and Turkmenistan?
0.156, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Turkmenistan?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Turkmenistan rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access?
Eswatini ranks 174th and Turkmenistan ranks 177th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 2.2: Online access. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

ODIN Open Data Openness score. This is a well-established data source with good country coverage. In using this indicator, it is important to describe carefully what is captured since the purpose of ODIN is different to the purpose of the SPI.