Croatia vs North Macedonia: Dimension 2.2: Online access

Croatia
0.621
in 2023
North Macedonia
0.631
in 2023
Croatia rank
63rd
North Macedonia rank
60th

Dimension 2.2: Online access over time

  • Croatia
  • North Macedonia
00.20.40.6201520192023

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 0.631 against 0.621 in Croatia, a difference of 0.01.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Croatia ranks 63rd and North Macedonia ranks 60th of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2010s 0.5058 0.6188 0.113 North Macedonia
2020s 0.6505 0.6335 0.017 Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access, Croatia or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 0.631 against 0.621 in Croatia as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access between Croatia and North Macedonia?
0.01, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and North Macedonia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Croatia and North Macedonia rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access?
Croatia ranks 63rd and North Macedonia ranks 60th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 2.2: Online access. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

ODIN Open Data Openness score. This is a well-established data source with good country coverage. In using this indicator, it is important to describe carefully what is captured since the purpose of ODIN is different to the purpose of the SPI.