Azerbaijan vs South Africa: Dimension 2.2: Online access

Azerbaijan
0.58
in 2023
South Africa
0.586
in 2023
Azerbaijan rank
79th
South Africa rank
76th

Dimension 2.2: Online access over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • South Africa
00.20.40.6201520192023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0.586 against 0.58 in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.006.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Azerbaijan ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 79th and South Africa ranks 76th of 177 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan South Africa Difference Ahead
2010s 0.412 0.4946 0.0826 South Africa
2020s 0.5615 0.591 0.0295 South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access, Azerbaijan or South Africa?
South Africa, at 0.586 against 0.58 in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access between Azerbaijan and South Africa?
0.006, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and South Africa?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Azerbaijan and South Africa rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access?
Azerbaijan ranks 79th and South Africa ranks 76th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 2.2: Online access. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

ODIN Open Data Openness score. This is a well-established data source with good country coverage. In using this indicator, it is important to describe carefully what is captured since the purpose of ODIN is different to the purpose of the SPI.