Azerbaijan vs Burkina Faso: Dimension 2.2: Online access

Azerbaijan
0.58
in 2023
Burkina Faso
0.57
in 2023
Azerbaijan rank
79th
Burkina Faso rank
81st

Dimension 2.2: Online access over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Burkina Faso
0.10.20.30.40.50.6201520192023

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 0.58 against 0.57 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.01.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Azerbaijan ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 79th and Burkina Faso ranks 81st of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Burkina Faso in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Burkina Faso Difference Ahead
2010s 0.412 0.2422 0.1698 Azerbaijan
2020s 0.5615 0.5705 0.009 Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access, Azerbaijan or Burkina Faso?
Azerbaijan, at 0.58 against 0.57 in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access between Azerbaijan and Burkina Faso?
0.01, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Burkina Faso?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Azerbaijan and Burkina Faso rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access?
Azerbaijan ranks 79th and Burkina Faso ranks 81st of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as Dimension 2.2: Online access. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

ODIN Open Data Openness score. This is a well-established data source with good country coverage. In using this indicator, it is important to describe carefully what is captured since the purpose of ODIN is different to the purpose of the SPI.