Sweden vs Tanzania: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score

Sweden
0.867
in 2023
Tanzania
0.876
in 2023
Sweden rank
33rd
Tanzania rank
31st

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score over time

  • Sweden
  • Tanzania
00.20.40.60.81201520192023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 0.876 against 0.867 in Sweden, a difference of 0.009.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Sweden ahead.

Sweden ranks 33rd and Tanzania ranks 31st of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Tanzania Difference Ahead
2010s 0.8872 0 0.8872 Sweden
2020s 0.867 0.888 0.021 Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score, Sweden or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 0.876 against 0.867 in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score between Sweden and Tanzania?
0.009, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Tanzania?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Sweden and Tanzania rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score?
Sweden ranks 33rd and Tanzania ranks 31st of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether data are made available under an open license. Open licenses must allow the use, reuse, and sharing or adaption of data for commercial and noncommercial use without any obligation other than attribution, per the Open Definition. Licenses prohibiting commercial use or having two or more additional stipulations are classified as “Not Open”. Licenses with no more than one additional stipulation are classified as “Some Restrictions.” Licenses that do not explicitly state all allowed uses under the Open Definition and do not include restrictive language are also classified as “Some Restrictions.”