Paraguay vs Rwanda: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score over time
- Paraguay
- Rwanda
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 0.826 against 0.821 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.005.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Rwanda ahead.
Paraguay ranks 45th and Rwanda ranks 46th of 177 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1518 | 0.9638 | 0.812 | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0.413 | 0.877 | 0.464 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score, Paraguay or Rwanda?
- Paraguay, at 0.826 against 0.821 in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score between Paraguay and Rwanda?
- 0.005, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Rwanda?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Paraguay and Rwanda rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score?
- Paraguay ranks 45th and Rwanda ranks 46th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether data are made available under an open license. Open licenses must allow the use, reuse, and sharing or adaption of data for commercial and noncommercial use without any obligation other than attribution, per the Open Definition. Licenses prohibiting commercial use or having two or more additional stipulations are classified as “Not Open”. Licenses with no more than one additional stipulation are classified as “Some Restrictions.” Licenses that do not explicitly state all allowed uses under the Open Definition and do not include restrictive language are also classified as “Some Restrictions.”