Mozambique vs Papua New Guinea: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score over time
- Mozambique
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 0.017 against 0 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.017.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Mozambique ranks 109th and Papua New Guinea ranks 112th of 180 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 0.0085 | 0.024 | 0.0155 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score, Mozambique or Papua New Guinea?
- Mozambique, at 0.017 against 0 in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score between Mozambique and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.017, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Papua New Guinea?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Mozambique and Papua New Guinea rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score?
- Mozambique ranks 109th and Papua New Guinea ranks 112th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether data are made available under an open license. Open licenses must allow the use, reuse, and sharing or adaption of data for commercial and noncommercial use without any obligation other than attribution, per the Open Definition. Licenses prohibiting commercial use or having two or more additional stipulations are classified as “Not Open”. Licenses with no more than one additional stipulation are classified as “Some Restrictions.” Licenses that do not explicitly state all allowed uses under the Open Definition and do not include restrictive language are also classified as “Some Restrictions.”