Macao vs Zimbabwe: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score

Macao
0.281
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.179
in 2023
Macao rank
82nd
Zimbabwe rank
84th

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score over time

  • Macao
  • Zimbabwe
00.10.20.30.4201520192023

How they compare

Macao currently reports 0.281 against 0.179 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.102.

That makes Macao's figure about 1.6 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Macao ahead.

Macao ranks 82nd and Zimbabwe ranks 84th of 177 countries.

Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macao Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 0.2627 0 0.2627 Macao
2020s 0.293 0.279 0.014 Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score, Macao or Zimbabwe?
Macao, at 0.281 against 0.179 in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score between Macao and Zimbabwe?
0.102, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Zimbabwe?
7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
How do Macao and Zimbabwe rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score?
Macao ranks 82nd and Zimbabwe ranks 84th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether data are made available under an open license. Open licenses must allow the use, reuse, and sharing or adaption of data for commercial and noncommercial use without any obligation other than attribution, per the Open Definition. Licenses prohibiting commercial use or having two or more additional stipulations are classified as “Not Open”. Licenses with no more than one additional stipulation are classified as “Some Restrictions.” Licenses that do not explicitly state all allowed uses under the Open Definition and do not include restrictive language are also classified as “Some Restrictions.”