Republic of Korea vs South Africa: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score over time
- Republic of Korea
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0.838 against 0.836 in Republic of Korea, a difference of 0.002.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was South Africa ahead.
Republic of Korea ranks 43rd and South Africa ranks 40th of 180 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.8013 | 0.7732 | 0.028 | Republic of Korea |
| 2020s | 0.868 | 0.8215 | 0.0465 | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score, Republic of Korea or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 0.838 against 0.836 in Republic of Korea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score between Republic of Korea and South Africa?
- 0.002, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and South Africa?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Republic of Korea and South Africa rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score?
- Republic of Korea ranks 43rd and South Africa ranks 40th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether data are made available under an open license. Open licenses must allow the use, reuse, and sharing or adaption of data for commercial and noncommercial use without any obligation other than attribution, per the Open Definition. Licenses prohibiting commercial use or having two or more additional stipulations are classified as “Not Open”. Licenses with no more than one additional stipulation are classified as “Some Restrictions.” Licenses that do not explicitly state all allowed uses under the Open Definition and do not include restrictive language are also classified as “Some Restrictions.”