Kazakhstan vs Rwanda: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score

Kazakhstan
0.798
in 2023
Rwanda
0.821
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
48th
Rwanda rank
46th

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Rwanda
00.20.40.60.81201520192023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.821 against 0.798 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.023.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Kazakhstan ranks 48th and Rwanda ranks 46th of 177 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Rwanda Difference Ahead
2010s 0 0.9638 0.9638 Rwanda
2020s 0.629 0.877 0.248 Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score, Kazakhstan or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.821 against 0.798 in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score between Kazakhstan and Rwanda?
0.023, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Rwanda?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Rwanda rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score?
Kazakhstan ranks 48th and Rwanda ranks 46th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether data are made available under an open license. Open licenses must allow the use, reuse, and sharing or adaption of data for commercial and noncommercial use without any obligation other than attribution, per the Open Definition. Licenses prohibiting commercial use or having two or more additional stipulations are classified as “Not Open”. Licenses with no more than one additional stipulation are classified as “Some Restrictions.” Licenses that do not explicitly state all allowed uses under the Open Definition and do not include restrictive language are also classified as “Some Restrictions.”