Greece vs Latvia: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score

Greece
0.886
in 2023
Latvia
0.888
in 2023
Greece rank
28th
Latvia rank
27th

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score over time

  • Greece
  • Latvia
00.20.40.60.81201620192023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.888 against 0.886 in Greece, a difference of 0.002.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Greece ahead.

Greece ranks 28th and Latvia ranks 27th of 177 countries.

Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greece Latvia Difference Ahead
2010s 0.933 0.25 0.683 Greece
2020s 0.919 0.444 0.475 Greece

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score, Greece or Latvia?
Latvia, at 0.888 against 0.886 in Greece as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score between Greece and Latvia?
0.002, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Latvia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Greece and Latvia rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score?
Greece ranks 28th and Latvia ranks 27th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether data are made available under an open license. Open licenses must allow the use, reuse, and sharing or adaption of data for commercial and noncommercial use without any obligation other than attribution, per the Open Definition. Licenses prohibiting commercial use or having two or more additional stipulations are classified as “Not Open”. Licenses with no more than one additional stipulation are classified as “Some Restrictions.” Licenses that do not explicitly state all allowed uses under the Open Definition and do not include restrictive language are also classified as “Some Restrictions.”