Denmark vs Hong Kong (China): Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score

Denmark
1
in 2023
Hong Kong (China)
1
in 2023
Denmark rank
1st
Hong Kong (China) rank
1st

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score over time

  • Denmark
  • Hong Kong (China)
00.20.40.60.81201620192023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 1 against 1 in Hong Kong (China), a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 1st and Hong Kong (China) ranks 1st of 179 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Hong Kong (China) Difference Ahead
2010s 0.9908 0.4748 0.516 Denmark
2020s 0.9835 0.9835 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score, Denmark or Hong Kong (China)?
Denmark, at 1 against 1 in Hong Kong (China) as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score between Denmark and Hong Kong (China)?
0, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Hong Kong (China)?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Hong Kong (China) rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score?
Denmark ranks 1st and Hong Kong (China) ranks 1st of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Hong Kong (China): Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score. Statizoid, drawing on Open Data Watch. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/dimension-2-2-online-access-terms-of-use-score/denmark/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/dimension-2-2-online-access-terms-of-use-score/denmark/hong-kong-sar-china/">Denmark vs Hong Kong (China): Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether data are made available under an open license. Open licenses must allow the use, reuse, and sharing or adaption of data for commercial and noncommercial use without any obligation other than attribution, per the Open Definition. Licenses prohibiting commercial use or having two or more additional stipulations are classified as “Not Open”. Licenses with no more than one additional stipulation are classified as “Some Restrictions.” Licenses that do not explicitly state all allowed uses under the Open Definition and do not include restrictive language are also classified as “Some Restrictions.”