Croatia vs Zimbabwe: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score

Croatia
0.229
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.179
in 2023
Croatia rank
83rd
Zimbabwe rank
84th

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score over time

  • Croatia
  • Zimbabwe
00.10.20.30.40.5201520192023

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 0.229 against 0.179 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.05.

That makes Croatia's figure about 1.3 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 83rd and Zimbabwe ranks 84th of 177 countries.

Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 0.4565 0.006 0.4505 Croatia
2020s 0.356 0.279 0.077 Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score, Croatia or Zimbabwe?
Croatia, at 0.229 against 0.179 in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score between Croatia and Zimbabwe?
0.05, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Zimbabwe?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Croatia and Zimbabwe rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score?
Croatia ranks 83rd and Zimbabwe ranks 84th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether data are made available under an open license. Open licenses must allow the use, reuse, and sharing or adaption of data for commercial and noncommercial use without any obligation other than attribution, per the Open Definition. Licenses prohibiting commercial use or having two or more additional stipulations are classified as “Not Open”. Licenses with no more than one additional stipulation are classified as “Some Restrictions.” Licenses that do not explicitly state all allowed uses under the Open Definition and do not include restrictive language are also classified as “Some Restrictions.”