Croatia vs Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score over time
- Croatia
- Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
How they compare
Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China currently reports 0.281 against 0.229 in Croatia, a difference of 0.052.
That makes Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China's figure about 1.2 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 83rd and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 82nd of 179 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.442 | 0.2627 | 0.1793 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0.356 | 0.293 | 0.063 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score, Croatia or Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
- Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China, at 0.281 against 0.229 in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score between Croatia and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
- 0.052, with Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score?
- Croatia ranks 83rd and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 82nd of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether data are made available under an open license. Open licenses must allow the use, reuse, and sharing or adaption of data for commercial and noncommercial use without any obligation other than attribution, per the Open Definition. Licenses prohibiting commercial use or having two or more additional stipulations are classified as “Not Open”. Licenses with no more than one additional stipulation are classified as “Some Restrictions.” Licenses that do not explicitly state all allowed uses under the Open Definition and do not include restrictive language are also classified as “Some Restrictions.”