Botswana vs Jordan: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score over time
- Botswana
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.774 against 0.771 in Botswana, a difference of 0.003.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Jordan ahead.
Botswana ranks 51st and Jordan ranks 50th of 177 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.5572 | 0.0142 | 0.543 | Botswana |
| 2020s | 0.7785 | 0.387 | 0.3915 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score, Botswana or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 0.774 against 0.771 in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score between Botswana and Jordan?
- 0.003, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Jordan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Jordan rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score?
- Botswana ranks 51st and Jordan ranks 50th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether data are made available under an open license. Open licenses must allow the use, reuse, and sharing or adaption of data for commercial and noncommercial use without any obligation other than attribution, per the Open Definition. Licenses prohibiting commercial use or having two or more additional stipulations are classified as “Not Open”. Licenses with no more than one additional stipulation are classified as “Some Restrictions.” Licenses that do not explicitly state all allowed uses under the Open Definition and do not include restrictive language are also classified as “Some Restrictions.”