Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Macau, China: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Macau, China
How they compare
Macau, China currently reports 0.281 against 0.171 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.11.
That makes Macau, China's figure about 1.6 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 85th and Macau, China ranks 82nd of 180 countries.
Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Macau, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 | 0.2627 | 0.2627 | Macau, China |
| 2020s | 0.0855 | 0.293 | 0.2075 | Macau, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Macau, China?
- Macau, China, at 0.281 against 0.171 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Macau, China?
- 0.11, with Macau, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Macau, China?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Macau, China rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 85th and Macau, China ranks 82nd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether data are made available under an open license. Open licenses must allow the use, reuse, and sharing or adaption of data for commercial and noncommercial use without any obligation other than attribution, per the Open Definition. Licenses prohibiting commercial use or having two or more additional stipulations are classified as “Not Open”. Licenses with no more than one additional stipulation are classified as “Some Restrictions.” Licenses that do not explicitly state all allowed uses under the Open Definition and do not include restrictive language are also classified as “Some Restrictions.”