Laos vs Zimbabwe: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score
Laos
0.833
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.833
in 2023
Laos rank
99th
Zimbabwe rank
99th
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score over time
- Laos
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Laos currently reports 0.833 against 0.833 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Laos ranks 99th and Zimbabwe ranks 99th of 177 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4788 | 0.565 | 0.0862 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.7925 | 0.85 | 0.0575 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score, Laos or Zimbabwe?
- Laos, at 0.833 against 0.833 in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score between Laos and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Zimbabwe?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Laos and Zimbabwe rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score?
- Laos ranks 99th and Zimbabwe ranks 99th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether data are made available in nonproprietary formats. Nonproprietary file formats are important because they allow users to access data without requiring the use of a costly, proprietary software that may prevent some users from accessing the data. Common nonproprietary formats include PDF, HTML, XLSX, DOCX, CSV, and JSON files.