Kenya vs Latvia: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score
Kenya
1
in 2023
Latvia
1
in 2023
Kenya rank
1st
Latvia rank
1st
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score over time
- Kenya
- Latvia
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 1 against 1 in Latvia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Latvia ahead.
Kenya ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.892 | 0.9263 | 0.0343 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.9665 | 0.919 | 0.0475 | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score, Kenya or Latvia?
- Kenya, at 1 against 1 in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score between Kenya and Latvia?
- 0, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Latvia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Latvia rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score?
- Kenya ranks 1st and Latvia ranks 1st of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether data are made available in nonproprietary formats. Nonproprietary file formats are important because they allow users to access data without requiring the use of a costly, proprietary software that may prevent some users from accessing the data. Common nonproprietary formats include PDF, HTML, XLSX, DOCX, CSV, and JSON files.