Cote d'Ivoire vs Marshall Islands: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score

Cote d'Ivoire
0.657
in 2023
Marshall Islands
0.638
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire rank
151st
Marshall Islands rank
154th

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Marshall Islands
00.20.40.60.8201520192023

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 0.657 against 0.638 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.019.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 151st and Marshall Islands ranks 154th of 177 countries.

Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Marshall Islands Difference Ahead
2010s 0.586 0.4692 0.1168 Cote d'Ivoire
2020s 0.762 0.688 0.074 Cote d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score, Cote d'Ivoire or Marshall Islands?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 0.657 against 0.638 in Marshall Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score between Cote d'Ivoire and Marshall Islands?
0.019, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Marshall Islands?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Marshall Islands rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 151st and Marshall Islands ranks 154th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether data are made available in nonproprietary formats. Nonproprietary file formats are important because they allow users to access data without requiring the use of a costly, proprietary software that may prevent some users from accessing the data. Common nonproprietary formats include PDF, HTML, XLSX, DOCX, CSV, and JSON files.