China vs Congo: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score
China
0.867
in 2023
Congo
0.867
in 2023
China rank
83rd
Congo rank
83rd
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score over time
- China
- Congo
How they compare
China currently reports 0.867 against 0.867 in Congo, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was China ahead.
China ranks 83rd and Congo ranks 83rd of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.7122 | 0.6312 | 0.081 | China |
| 2020s | 0.8335 | 0.867 | 0.0335 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score, China or Congo?
- China, at 0.867 against 0.867 in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score between China and Congo?
- 0, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Congo?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do China and Congo rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score?
- China ranks 83rd and Congo ranks 83rd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether data are made available in nonproprietary formats. Nonproprietary file formats are important because they allow users to access data without requiring the use of a costly, proprietary software that may prevent some users from accessing the data. Common nonproprietary formats include PDF, HTML, XLSX, DOCX, CSV, and JSON files.