Chile vs Lesotho: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score
Chile
0.805
in 2023
Lesotho
0.805
in 2023
Chile rank
109th
Lesotho rank
109th
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score over time
- Chile
- Lesotho
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.805 against 0.805 in Lesotho, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 109th and Lesotho ranks 109th of 177 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4758 | 0.6144 | 0.1386 | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 0.774 | 0.886 | 0.112 | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score, Chile or Lesotho?
- Chile, at 0.805 against 0.805 in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score between Chile and Lesotho?
- 0, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Lesotho?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Lesotho rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score?
- Chile ranks 109th and Lesotho ranks 109th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether data are made available in nonproprietary formats. Nonproprietary file formats are important because they allow users to access data without requiring the use of a costly, proprietary software that may prevent some users from accessing the data. Common nonproprietary formats include PDF, HTML, XLSX, DOCX, CSV, and JSON files.