Chad vs Kiribati: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score over time
- Chad
- Kiribati
How they compare
Chad currently reports 0.605 against 0.571 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.034.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Kiribati ahead.
Chad ranks 161st and Kiribati ranks 163rd of 180 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.2014 | 0.4852 | 0.2838 | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 0.5645 | 0.5825 | 0.018 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score, Chad or Kiribati?
- Chad, at 0.605 against 0.571 in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score between Chad and Kiribati?
- 0.034, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Kiribati?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Kiribati rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score?
- Chad ranks 161st and Kiribati ranks 163rd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether data are made available in nonproprietary formats. Nonproprietary file formats are important because they allow users to access data without requiring the use of a costly, proprietary software that may prevent some users from accessing the data. Common nonproprietary formats include PDF, HTML, XLSX, DOCX, CSV, and JSON files.