Botswana vs Congo: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score
Botswana
0.867
in 2023
Congo
0.867
in 2023
Botswana rank
83rd
Congo rank
83rd
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score over time
- Botswana
- Congo
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0.867 against 0.867 in Congo, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Congo ahead.
Botswana ranks 83rd and Congo ranks 83rd of 177 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.6696 | 0.6312 | 0.0384 | Botswana |
| 2020s | 0.867 | 0.867 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score, Botswana or Congo?
- Botswana, at 0.867 against 0.867 in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score between Botswana and Congo?
- 0, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Congo?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Congo rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score?
- Botswana ranks 83rd and Congo ranks 83rd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether data are made available in nonproprietary formats. Nonproprietary file formats are important because they allow users to access data without requiring the use of a costly, proprietary software that may prevent some users from accessing the data. Common nonproprietary formats include PDF, HTML, XLSX, DOCX, CSV, and JSON files.