Armenia vs Liechtenstein: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score

Armenia
0.929
in 2023
Liechtenstein
0.919
in 2023
Armenia rank
58th
Liechtenstein rank
61st

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score over time

  • Armenia
  • Liechtenstein
00.20.40.60.81201520192023

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 0.929 against 0.919 in Liechtenstein, a difference of 0.01.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 58th and Liechtenstein ranks 61st of 177 countries.

Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Liechtenstein Difference Ahead
2010s 0.76 0.6 0.16 Armenia
2020s 0.905 0.807 0.098 Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score, Armenia or Liechtenstein?
Armenia, at 0.929 against 0.919 in Liechtenstein as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score between Armenia and Liechtenstein?
0.01, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Liechtenstein?
7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
How do Armenia and Liechtenstein rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - non-proprietary format score?
Armenia ranks 58th and Liechtenstein ranks 61st of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Non-Proprietary format Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether data are made available in nonproprietary formats. Nonproprietary file formats are important because they allow users to access data without requiring the use of a costly, proprietary software that may prevent some users from accessing the data. Common nonproprietary formats include PDF, HTML, XLSX, DOCX, CSV, and JSON files.