Rwanda vs Sao Tome and Principe: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Rwanda
0.517
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.521
in 2023
Rwanda rank
72nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
71st
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time
- Rwanda
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.521 against 0.517 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.004.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 72nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 71st of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.7054 | 0.0178 | 0.6876 | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0.493 | 0.5175 | 0.0245 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Rwanda or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.521 against 0.517 in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.004, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
- Rwanda ranks 72nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 71st of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.