Papua New Guinea vs Zambia: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Papua New Guinea
0.326
in 2023
Zambia
0.329
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
164th
Zambia rank
162nd
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 0.329 against 0.326 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.003.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 164th and Zambia ranks 162nd of 180 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1684 | 0.3006 | 0.1322 | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0.2775 | 0.4205 | 0.143 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Papua New Guinea or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 0.329 against 0.326 in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Papua New Guinea and Zambia?
- 0.003, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zambia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Zambia rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 164th and Zambia ranks 162nd of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.