Niger vs Sri Lanka: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score

Niger
0.467
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0.476
in 2023
Niger rank
103rd
Sri Lanka rank
100th

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time

  • Niger
  • Sri Lanka
00.20.40.6201520192023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0.476 against 0.467 in Niger, a difference of 0.009.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Niger ranks 103rd and Sri Lanka ranks 100th of 177 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Niger Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2010s 0.4672 0.5152 0.048 Sri Lanka
2020s 0.45 0.4595 0.0095 Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Niger or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 0.476 against 0.467 in Niger as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Niger and Sri Lanka?
0.009, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Sri Lanka?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Niger and Sri Lanka rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
Niger ranks 103rd and Sri Lanka ranks 100th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.