Montenegro vs Rwanda: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score

Montenegro
0.517
in 2023
Rwanda
0.517
in 2023
Montenegro rank
72nd
Rwanda rank
72nd

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time

  • Montenegro
  • Rwanda
00.20.40.60.81201520192023

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 0.517 against 0.517 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Rwanda ahead.

Montenegro ranks 72nd and Rwanda ranks 72nd of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montenegro Rwanda Difference Ahead
2010s 0.6272 0.7054 0.0782 Rwanda
2020s 0.5965 0.493 0.1035 Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Montenegro or Rwanda?
Montenegro, at 0.517 against 0.517 in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Montenegro and Rwanda?
0, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Rwanda?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Montenegro and Rwanda rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
Montenegro ranks 72nd and Rwanda ranks 72nd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.