Macao vs Zambia: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Macao
0.352
in 2023
Zambia
0.329
in 2023
Macao rank
157th
Zambia rank
159th
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time
- Macao
- Zambia
How they compare
Macao currently reports 0.352 against 0.329 in Zambia, a difference of 0.023.
That makes Macao's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Macao ahead.
Macao ranks 157th and Zambia ranks 159th of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Macao averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macao | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4547 | 0.3167 | 0.138 | Macao |
| 2020s | 0.376 | 0.4205 | 0.0445 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Macao or Zambia?
- Macao, at 0.352 against 0.329 in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Macao and Zambia?
- 0.023, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Zambia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Macao and Zambia rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
- Macao ranks 157th and Zambia ranks 159th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.