Lithuania vs Oman: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Lithuania
0.783
in 2023
Oman
0.802
in 2023
Lithuania rank
18th
Oman rank
16th
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time
- Lithuania
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 0.802 against 0.783 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.019.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 18th and Oman ranks 16th of 177 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.7953 | 0.5162 | 0.279 | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0.8915 | 0.801 | 0.0905 | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Lithuania or Oman?
- Oman, at 0.802 against 0.783 in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Lithuania and Oman?
- 0.019, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Oman?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Oman rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
- Lithuania ranks 18th and Oman ranks 16th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.