Lithuania vs Mongolia: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score

Lithuania
0.783
in 2023
Mongolia
0.8
in 2023
Lithuania rank
18th
Mongolia rank
17th

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time

  • Lithuania
  • Mongolia
00.20.40.60.81201520192023

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 0.8 against 0.783 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.017.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 18th and Mongolia ranks 17th of 177 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Mongolia Difference Ahead
2010s 0.7953 0.6932 0.102 Lithuania
2020s 0.8915 0.768 0.1235 Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Lithuania or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 0.8 against 0.783 in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Lithuania and Mongolia?
0.017, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Mongolia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Mongolia rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
Lithuania ranks 18th and Mongolia ranks 17th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.