Lebanon vs Zambia: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score

Lebanon
0.333
in 2023
Zambia
0.329
in 2023
Lebanon rank
158th
Zambia rank
159th

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time

  • Lebanon
  • Zambia
00.20.40.6201520192023

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports 0.333 against 0.329 in Zambia, a difference of 0.004.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Lebanon ahead.

Lebanon ranks 158th and Zambia ranks 159th of 177 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lebanon Zambia Difference Ahead
2010s 0.387 0.3006 0.0864 Lebanon
2020s 0.408 0.4205 0.0125 Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Lebanon or Zambia?
Lebanon, at 0.333 against 0.329 in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Lebanon and Zambia?
0.004, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Zambia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Lebanon and Zambia rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
Lebanon ranks 158th and Zambia ranks 159th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.