Lebanon vs Macao: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Lebanon
0.333
in 2023
Macao
0.352
in 2023
Lebanon rank
158th
Macao rank
157th
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time
- Lebanon
- Macao
How they compare
Macao currently reports 0.352 against 0.333 in Lebanon, a difference of 0.019.
That makes Macao's figure about 1.1 times Lebanon's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Macao ahead.
Lebanon ranks 158th and Macao ranks 157th of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 1 and Macao in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.358 | 0.4547 | 0.0967 | Macao |
| 2020s | 0.408 | 0.376 | 0.032 | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Lebanon or Macao?
- Macao, at 0.352 against 0.333 in Lebanon as of 2023.
- What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Lebanon and Macao?
- 0.019, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Macao?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Lebanon and Macao rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
- Lebanon ranks 158th and Macao ranks 157th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.