Laos vs Mauritania: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score

Laos
0.433
in 2023
Mauritania
0.433
in 2023
Laos rank
125th
Mauritania rank
125th

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score over time

  • Laos
  • Mauritania
00.10.20.30.40.5201520192023

How they compare

Laos currently reports 0.433 against 0.433 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Mauritania ahead.

Laos ranks 125th and Mauritania ranks 125th of 177 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Laos Mauritania Difference Ahead
2010s 0.3696 0.4484 0.0788 Mauritania
2020s 0.381 0.408 0.027 Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score, Laos or Mauritania?
Laos, at 0.433 against 0.433 in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score between Laos and Mauritania?
0, with Laos ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Mauritania?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Laos and Mauritania rank globally for dimension 2.2: online access - metadata available score?
Laos ranks 125th and Mauritania ranks 125th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Open Data Watch, published as Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Metadata Available Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether metadata are available for the published indicators. Metadata must be located in or near the data file or on a designated metadata section of the website. ODIN looks for three aspects of metadata: (1) definition of indicator; (2) date of upload; and (3) Source agency.